10.000 Hours

We can master anything if we work 10.000 hours on it, Gladwell says…

Frank Auerbach – Texture, Texture, Ah Texture [born 1931; mostly Expressionism]

Posted by iWrite on March 4, 2011

The most exciting and impressive first one-man show by an English painter since Francis Bacon in 1949,” wrote David Sylvester in the Listener. (http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2001/sep/15/arts.highereducation1)

I am writing this post driven by a comment of a friend of mine on a photo of a painting of Auerbach – one of his distorted, gray / bnw portraits: he thought it was too simple and he could do it as well without any trouble. The complexity of the painting was indeed not obvious in the photo but the genius of Auerbach, one of my favourite painters in the world, is obvious! Let’s detail this a little.

The first time I saw Auerbach, I was literally hit by the texture of his paintings. From the distance, the painting looks normal, figurations – mostly portraits, beautiful in the context the color creates, but as you get closer you discover  incredible volume and texture. The painting almost becomes an engraving, there

are so many layers of painting that it look like coming out of the canvas. It’s a fascinating effect, you can’t help wondering how is that possible.

 

I will return to Auerbach and his incredible technique briefly, but if you are in London get u

p now, go to Courtauld Gallery or Tate and see Auerbach. Close-up!

Posted in 21st c., Art, Auerbach Frank, Expressionism | Leave a Comment »

A Good Earth Photography Site

Posted by iWrite on September 10, 2010

http://www.earth-photography.com/

Countries

Denmark
A flavor of Scandinavia
USA
Cityscapes
Hong Kong
East meets west
Greece
By the sea
Poland
From Auschwitz to Cracow
Malta
Mixed heritage
Slovenia
Triglav National Park
Australia
Hot, vast and remote
Singapore
Ultra-modern ex-British colony
Czech Republic
Prague & Kutná Hora
Ukraine
Chernobyl and Kiev
Slovakia
Iceworld
Iceland
Untouched landscapes
Finland
Helsinki, frozen
Wales
Remote lands
Egypt
Urban life in Cairo
Ireland
Green and gray lands
Morocco
Medina life
France
Paris and the riviera
Hungary
Beautiful Budapest
Switzerland
Mountain and lake
Norway
Breath-taking scenery
Sweden
The colors of Stockholm
Germany
Metropolis, countryside
The Netherlands
Amsterdam, The Hague…
Croatia
Travels along the Adriatic
Isle of Man
Mythical island
Austria
Vienna, Salzburg & more
Italy
Pompeii, Venice, Rome…
Spain
From Barcelona to the end of Europe
Turkey
City of 12 million people
Portugal
Seafood heaven
Living + Abstract

Abstract Nature Human Animals

Posted in Photography | Leave a Comment »

The Drawings of Leonardo

Posted by iWrite on September 8, 2010

www.drawingsofleonardo.org

Study of a Tuscan Landscape, c. 1473 Study of Arms and Hands, c. 1474 Man with a Staff, c. 1476-1480 Siege Machine, c. 1480 Saint Sebastion, c. 1480 Study of Horse and Rider, c. 1480 Study of Horse and Rider, c. 1481
Designs for a Boat, c. 1485-7 An Artillery Park, c. 1487 Study of a Young Woman in Profile, c. 1485-7 Grotesque Profile, c. 1487-90 Design for a Flying Machine, c. 1488 Design for a Flying Machine, c. 1488 Proportions of the Head, c. 1488-9
Study for the Sforza Monument, c. 1488-9 View of a Skull, c. 1489 View of a Skull, c. 1489 View of a Skull, c. 1489 Study of a Womb, c. 1489 Proportions of the Face and Eye, c. 1489 Five Characters in a Comic Scene, c. 1490
Ill-matched Couple, c. 1490 Study of a Woman, c. 1490 Vitruvian Man, c. 1490 Christ Figure, c. 1490-5 Studies of Concave Mirrors of Differing Curvatures, c. 1492 Coition of a Hemisected Man and Woman, c. 1492 Study for the Last Supper, c. 1495
Stretching Device for a Barrel Spring, c. 1498 Anatomy of a Male Nude, c 1504-6 A Grotesque Head, c. 1504-7 Design for a Flying Machine, c. 1505 Study for the Head of Leda, c. 1505-7 Study for the Kneeling Leda, c. 1505-7 The Principal Organs and Vascular and Urino-Genital Systems of a Woman, c. 1507
Study for the Trivulzio Monument, c. 1508 Study of Brain Physiology, c. 1508 Studies of Water passing Obstacles and falling, c. 1508-9 Studies of the Shoulder and Neck, c. 1509-1510 Studies of the Shoulder and Neck, c. 1509-1510 Studies of the Shoulder and Neck, c. 1509-1510 Sedge, c. 1510
Studies of the Arm showing the Movements made by the Biceps, c. 1510 Views of a Fetus in the Womb, c. 1510-12 Head of Saint Anne, c. 1510-5 Study of Cats and Other Animals c. 1513 Old Man with Water Studies, c. 1513 Possible Self-Portrait, c. 1513 Anatomy of the Neck, c. 1515

Posted in Art, Leonardo Da Vinci, Renaissance | Leave a Comment »

Claude Monet – Dare to Give Up Black [1840 - 1926; Impressionism]

Posted by iWrite on June 7, 2010

Monnet is the Impressionist par excellence. He actually was the reason why the movement had the name after all: he exhibited his painting ‘An Impression, Sunrise’ (above – painted in Le Havre in 1872) in 1874. A part of its title was used derisively by a critic to label the whole movement ‘Impressionism’. This exhibition is now known as the First Impressionist Exhibition. It is interesting as the name of “impressionism” was actually born by accident. Monet didn’t have a name for the above mentioned painting, when rushed by his brother, Edouard to come up with a name for the exhibition, he just chose in a hurry “Impression”. Edouard added the “sunrise” part, thus creating a label that made it across times.

He painted outdoors, educated by his mentor Boudin. Monet’s devotion to painting out of doors is illustrated by the famous story concerning one of his most ambitious early works, Women in the Garden (Musée d’Orsay, Paris; 1866-67). The picture is about 2.5 meters high and to enable him to paint all of it outside he had a trench dug in the garden so that the canvas could be raised or lowered by pulleys to the height he required. Courbet visited him when he was working on it and said Monet would not paint even the leaves in the background unless the lighting conditions were exactly right (http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/monet/).

Color, bright color, beautiful, bold color, this is the main trait of Monet. He is famous for the bridges and the water lilies, and what I personally find fascinating is that the Impressionists do not use black. Try to find black in Monet’s painting, yet the dark tones are dark. At the same time they were the first painters who dared to use pure white in the paintings. Until them, that would have been considered one of the big mistakes of painting.

The Impressionists (the most famous being Renoir, Cezanne, Degas) still make waves in the art world. Maybe it is because the Impressionism era was brief and the paintings are rare, maybe because they were scandalous though the colors and subjects they chose, maybe because they dared to use pure white, without any fear and gave up black completely, choosing to actually use combinations of colors instead.

No matter the reasons, an exhibition of Impressionists will never be dull or lack of visitors. Their paintings are bright and bold, again fighting with the times he lived in and with mentalities and limits.

“By his fellow painters Monet was regarded as a leader, not because he was the most intellectual or theoretically minded or because he was able to answer questions that they could not answer, but because in his art he seemed to be more alert to the possibilities latent in their common ideas, which he then developed in his work in a more radical way than did the others. Considering how all these painters developed their intensely personal manners with respect to the new artistic ideas, we may observe that the new elements appeared most often for the first time in the work of Monet and then were taken over by the other Impressionists, who incorporated them as suggestions or as definite means and applied them in their own ways.” (http://www.artchive.com/artchive/M/monet.html)

“There is still another reason for Monet’s outstanding position as an Impressionist. If we compare his paintings over a short period with the paintings of the others, we see that while the others painted within a restricted range of ideas and even of feelings, so that the Renoirs of the period 1873-76 are characterized by the joyousness in a collective world of recreation described earlier, Monet, with his powerful, ever alert eye, was able to paint at the same time brilliant pictures and also rather grayed ones in neutral tones. He was more reactive, he had more of that quality that psychologists of that time called “Impressionability.” That is to say, he was open to more varied stimuli from the common world that for these painters was the evident source of the subjects of their paintings. (http://www.artchive.com/artchive/M/monet.html)

Impresionissm techniques and specific traits

The concept of the impression was of central importance to a good deal of Impressionist practice. An impression was generally accepted at this time to be either the initial impression a scene made on the mind, or a kind of rough sketch, often made on the spot, which related to this. An impression was not thought to be suitably detailed or finished enough to be exhibited. (http://www.artandarchitecture.org.uk/insight/virag_imptechniques/virag_imptechniques01.html)

The Impressionists were excited by contemporary developments in colour theory which helped their search for a more exact analysis of the effects of colour and light in nature. They abandoned the conventional idea that the shadow of an object was made up from its colour with some brown or black added. Instead, they enriched their colours with the idea that the shadow of an object is broken up with dashes of its complementary colour. For example, in an Impressionist painting the shadow on an orange may have some strokes of blue painted into it to increase its vitality.

The Impressionists sought to capture the atmosphere of a particular time of day or the effects of different weather conditions on the landscape. In order to capture these fleeting effects they had to work quickly. They applied their paint in small brightly coloured strokes which meant sacrificing much of the outline and detail of their subject. Their painting technique put them at odds with the conservative Académie of the French artistic establishment who valued subtle colour and precise detail which was carefully crafted with great skill in the artist’s studio. What the Académie failed to appreciate was the freshness of Impressionist colour and the energy of their brushwork which revealed a spontaneity that had only previously been valued in the sketches of the old masters. However, the public grew to love the vitality of the Impressionist technique and in time Impressionism grew to become the most popular movement in the history of art.(http://www.artyfactory.com/art_appreciation/art_movements/impressionism.htm)

Other Impressionists (http://www.biography.com/impressionists/index.jsp)

Paul Cezanne; Frederic Bazile; Edgar Degas; Edouard Manet; Mary  Cassatt; Berthe Morisot; Camille Pissaro; Pierre-Auguste Renoir; Alfred Sisley.

Works: you can find some of his paintings on this site, as well as on the artchive site.

http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/monet/

Posted in Impressionism, Monet Claude | 2 Comments »

Raising Vienna – Gustav Klimt (1862 – 1918)

Posted by iWrite on May 13, 2010

There are so many things to say about this amazing artist, who chose rebellion rather than compromising his idea of beauty.

A genius and a rebel, without very much consistency in his personal life but with amazing painting ideas and indestructible desire for authenticity. His life can be perfectly described by the Schiller quote he included in his painting Nuda Veritas in 1899 (right)  “If you cannot please everyone with your art, please a few. To please many is bad”.

His life is troubled with scandals, alcohol, women and controversy. His paintings are powerful and reflect his inner struggles and the impossibility to reach out the main public.

Klimt and his associates formed a Secession, intending to modernize the old Rococo project Gesamtkunstwerk, the complete work of art (term used to ridiculize Bernini’s project to unify architecture, sculpture and painting in the 17th c.), in a fascinating era of fusion of vision with music. Beethoven’s musical notes, Nietzche’s philosophy would have been incorporated into Klimt’s art if his commissioners accepted his mix of mistery and eroticism. The abstract bits of painting are separated of the dense drawing, showing some relation with the Art Nouveau’s greatest architect, Antoni Gaudi.

Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I -1907  ($135 million – left) and Adele Bloch-bauer II -1912 ($87.9 million – lower right), are in the top 20 most expensive paintings in the world, both sold privately in 2006.

A very well done site about Klimt and details about his life can be found here:

http://www.iklimt.com/

Work

http://www.artinthepicture.com/artists/Gustav_Klimt/

Some of Klimt’s paintings that were lost during the war can be found here:several Gustav Klimt paintings that had been lost or destroyed over time.  Most had been intentionally destroyed by German agents at the end of World War II.  Other paintings were taken away from their Jewish owners as the manifestations of the Holocaust swept across Europe.’

http://sexualityinart.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/gustav-klimts-lost-paintings/

Posted in Gesamtkunstwerk, Klimt Gustav, Secession, Symbolism | Leave a Comment »

Jackson Pollock – How Drips of Painting can Make the Difference (1912 – 1956)

Posted by iWrite on May 10, 2010

Controversial and criticized, Pollock’s paintings are either loved or hated. His art is considered either genius or ‘decorative ‘wallpaper’, essentially brainless’ (satirist Craig Brown).

Nevertheles, No. 5 (left) was sold for $140 million in 2006, becoming the world’s most expensive painting.

I wouldn’t want to get into a debate regarding what is art and what are the limits of it, but one thing is certain about Pollock: he is a niche, he brought a new approach to painting and his works are unique. In a period when we are sourrounded by almost everything and it seems that everything was already done, he “broke the ice”, as De Kooning said, while suggesting that Pollock brought a new approach to art with his dripping paint technique. Leaving aside discussions and critiques, I see passion in Pollock’s work. Passion and dedication.

“When I am in my painting, I’m not aware of what I’m doing. It is only after a sort of “get acquainted” period that I see what I have been about. I have no fears about making changes, destroying the image, etc., because the painting has a life of its own. I try to let it come through. It is only when I lose contact with the painting that the result is a mess. Otherwise there is pure harmony, an easy give and take, and the painting comes out well.” Jackson Pollock

Bio & Opinions

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/P/pollock.html

[...] an important practitioner of Abstract Expressionism [...] Pollock was already experimenting with Surrealist automatism, but after the War he settled in Long Island and began to develop the Action techniques for which he is best known, dripping and throwing paint onto large canvases which were laid on the studio floor and only cut once the work was completed. He produced his first such abstraction in 1945. The intention was to avoid a focus for the work, to be part of it during creation (actually walking over it), to treat it as an object and to work semi automatically (‘painting has a life of its own’). His attitude was later influential to Performance artists and happenings.

Despite his abstraction, Pollock used evocative, descriptive titles for many of these works (e.g. Cathedral, 1947, Dallas). The mesh of drips and dashes, often textured by the addition of sand and other materials, created a floating spatial rhythm. In 1951, suffering from alcoholic depression, he reduced his colours and began to work with black enamels of unprimed canvas. Dreamlike figures began to creep back into his work (e.g. Portrait and Dream, 1953, private collection).

http://www.nga.gov/feature/pollock/artist1.shtm

http://www.jacksonpollock.com/bio.shtml

Works

http://www.artcyclopedia.com/artists/pollock_jackson.html

http://www.jacksonpollock.com/art.shtml

Play

http://www.manetas.com/pollock/

Posted in 20th c., Abstract Expressionism, Art, Artists, Pollock Jackson | Leave a Comment »

How Simplicity Becomes Complex – Mark Rothko (1903-1970)

Posted by iWrite on May 4, 2010

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/R/rothko.html

One’s first impression of the exhibition, for instance, is that Rothko’s work is a seamless whole, developing with a relentless inner logic from his earliest years to his very last works. Rothko’s stacked rectangles, that first appear in the 1930s in a bureau’s drawers, or a building facade, or a subway station, lead inexorably into the backgrounds of his surrealist-inspired organic work of the early 1940s, reassemble themselves in a series of transitional works before 1950, and then emerge triumphant in his familiar “signature” format, upon which he played more or less successful variations for the rest of his life.

Of all our century’s art movements, Abstract Expressionism in general, and the “signature styles” of its artists in particular, deal with such big symbols — if only because they have rejected any form of “realism” in the sense of depicting objects of quotidian visual experience. That decided, they had no other “subject” than what made them, as individuals, human. Each found their abstract equivalent of a self-portrait, and they painted that reality — that song of self — with a passion, bravura, and decisiveness unequaled in modern art. This is the greatest contribution of Abstract Expressionism.

http://www.nga.gov/feature/rothko/intro1.shtm

Abstract Expressionism

The term “Abstract Expressionism” was first used in Germany in connection with Rusian artist Wassily Kandinsky in 1919 (referencing the German Expressionists with their anti-figurative aesthetic), but later became more commonly associated with Post-WWII American Art.

http://www.arthistoryarchive.com/arthistory/abstractexpressionism/

The works of Mark Rothko:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xrHHn5TR4E

Works

No, 10 (1950)

1968 (1)

1968 (2)

Orange and Tan

1949

Untitled (1949)

White Center

Untitled (three nudes), 1933/1934 – http://www.nga.gov/feature/rothko/early3.shtm

Self-Portrait,1936, – http://www.nga.gov/feature/rothko/early5b.shtm

No. 8, 1949 – http://www.nga.gov/feature/rothko/abstraction4.shtm

Untitled [Blue, Green, and Brown],1952 – http://www.nga.gov/feature/rothko/classic4.shtm

Untitled,1953 – http://www.nga.gov/feature/rothko/classic6.shtm

Untitled, 1968 – http://www.nga.gov/feature/rothko/late4a.shtm

Untitled,1953 – http://www.nga.gov/feature/rothko/late5.shtm

Posted in Abstract, Abstract Expressionism, Rothko Mark, Surrealism | 2 Comments »

No Price on Beauty – Yves Klein (1928-1962)

Posted by iWrite on May 4, 2010

 

“Believe me, one is not robbed when one buys such paintings; it is I who am always robbed because I accept money.” Yves Klein

http://www.yveskleinarchives.org/

“in 1946, while still an adolescent, I was to sign my name on the other side of the sky during a fantastic “realistico-imaginary” journey. That day, as I lay stretched upon the beach of Nice, I began to feel hatred for birds which flew back and forth across my blue sky, cloudless sky, because they tried to bore holes in my greatest and most beautiful work.”

-Yves Klein

 “After having gone through several periods, my research has led me to paint unified monochrome pictures. My canvases are therefore covered by one or several layers of a single color after a certain preparation of     the support and using various technical procedures. No drawing is visible, no variation in hue; there is nothing but the UNITY of a single color. The dominant invades the entire picture, as it were. In this way I seek to individualize the color, because I have come to believe that there is a living world of each color and I express these worlds. My paintings, moreover, represent an idea of absolute unity in perfect serenity; an abstract idea represented abstractly, which has made me rank myself with the abstract painters. But I hasten to point out to you that the abstractionists do not understand it this way and they reproach me, among other things, for refusing to provoke relations between colorsÉ. I think that the color “yellow,” for example, is quite sufficient in itself to render an atmosphere and a climate “beyond the thinkable”; what is more, the nuances of yellow are infinite, leaving the possibility to interpret it in many different ways.

For me, each nuance of a color is in some way an individual, a being who is not only from the same race as the base color, but who definitely possesses a distinct character and personal soul.… Nuances can be gentle, evil, violent, majestic, vulgar, calm, etc. In sum, each nuance of each color is definitely a “presence,” a living being, an active force which is born and dies after having lived a sort of drama of the life of colors.”

Yves Klein’s theoretical dimension was already evident in this first show. The decisive meeting with Pierre Restany at the Club des Solitaires was to be a crucial element in both Yves Kleins’ and Pierre Restany’s careers.

http://www.yvesklein.de/yves_klein.html

Posted in Neo-Dada, Post-Modernism, Yves Klein | Leave a Comment »

Georges Seurat [1859-1891; Pointillism]

Posted by iWrite on April 29, 2010

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/S/seurat.html

“Admirers of Seurat often regret his method, the little dots. Imagine, Renoir said, Veronese’s Marriage at Cana done in petit point. I cannot imagine it, but neither can I imagine Seurat’s pictures painted in broad or blended strokes. Like his choice of tones, Seurat’s technique is intensely personal. But the dots are not simply a technique; they are a tangible surface and the ground of important qualities, including his finesse. Too much has been written, and often incorrectly, about the scientific nature of the dots. The question whether they make a picture more or less luminous hardly matters. A painting can be luminous and artistically dull, or low-keyed in color and radiant to the mind. Besides, bow to paint brightly is no secret requiring a special knowledge of science. Like Van Gogh, Seurat could have used strong colors in big areas for a brighter effect. But without his peculiar means we would not have the marvelous delicacy of tone, the uncountable variations within a narrow range, the vibrancy and soft luster, which make his canvases, and especially his landscapes, a joy to contemplate. Nor would we have his surprising image-world where the continuous form is built up from the discrete, and the solid masses emerge from an endless scattering of fine points – a mystery of the coming-into-being for the eye. The dots in Seurat’s paintings have something of the quality of the black grains in his incomparable drawings in conte crayon where the varying density of the grains determines the gradations of tone. This span from the tiny to the large is only one of the many striking polarities in his art.

- From Meyer Schapiro, “Modern Art”

1883-84: Une baignade, Asniéres

1885: Boats, Low Tide, Grandcamp

1886: A Corner of the Harbor of Honfleur

1888: Port-en-Bessin

1889: The Eiffel Tower

1890: The Channel at Gravelines, Evening

1890: The Channel at Gravelines, in the direction of the Sea

1891: Cirque

Posted in Art, Artists, Pointillism, Seurat Georges | Leave a Comment »

Color

Posted by iWrite on April 28, 2010

As I am in my ‘Matisse” mood, I think I would like to appreciate color a little bit. Not from a technical point of view but from a personal perspective. Basically I would like to talk about the feeling I have when I am invaded by color. I get excited, maybe overwhelmed (if there’s bright orange or bright pink I might even get a little bit tired) but the genereal sensation is a flow of energy going trough my body. Reviving.

I don’t understand the question ‘what’s your favorite color’. How can you choose? I see a beautiful combination of brown, copper, gold and my eyes are singing, just as they do when I am in front of Picasso’s blue or rose period. I can’t choose color, like I can’t choose a favorite painting, a favorite painting style, a favorite book and favorite author and so on. There is so much beauty and there are different feelings caused by different things, I could not choose one thing and say this is the best I’ve ever seen. It could be the best I’ve ever felt in this moment but the strongest feelings are the ones you feel right now so again, that is relative.

I love color, I like to see a colorful mess and I find meaning in it. It makes me feel. 

With this note tomorrow I will get to Picasso. He is so vibrant, his paintings are full of life. I believe he was as well.

Soon I will write about the paintings myself, for now I resume myself to providing links and general ideas. When I have something to say, I will say it.

Posted in The blog | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.